Genetic
Cancer Theory Disproven Yet Continues to be Propagated
By: Dr.
Loretta Lanphier, ND, CN, HHP, CH
The Cancer Epidemic That Continues
Are
you aware that nearly 50% of Americans will develop some form of cancer
today, and that by 2050 the cancer rate will have nearly doubled?
(National Cancer Institute – NCI) With billions given to research for a
cure, prevention methods and supposedly the most brilliant minds to task,
the last 40 years have yielded very little in regards to either objective.
We’re a nation with one of the greatest technological capabilities known to
man, a world super power, yet have the third sickest population falling only
to China and India (U.S. Census Bureau – extrapolations). Making
matters worse are statistics that show chronic disease wildly more prevalent
within developed / industrialized nations.
Is Cancer Really Genetic?
A
succession of scientific findings beginning with studies conducted in the
late 19th and early 20th century combined with the discovery of
the oncogene by MIT’s-Dr. Robert A. Weinberg has led scientists to suggest
that cancer is genetic and is caused by a sequence of DNA mutations caused
by the gene. The well reported nature of these findings began the spark of
the wide spread belief that cancer is in fact genetic. These happenings have
now cumulated into the mammoth research project through the International
Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) in which the leviathan like organization
seeks to identify and catalogue the genetic mutation structure of 50
different cancer types. ICGC scientists from 10 different countries predict
it will take “at least five years and many hundreds of thousands of dollars
to complete this mammoth task” in addition to developing new drugs.
Scientists suggest that if the DNA mutations that lead to cancer can be
detected early enough through “MoT-style blood tests” then specific drug
treatments can begin for the early stage cancer. (UK Wellcome Trust
Scientific Research Team of the ICGC) Clearly stated, the hope and
goal of their findings are to develop and test on their human lab-rats
“more” drugs which, historically have shown to exacerbate
existing conditions while creating brand new ones, all while growing fat
pockets for the pharmaceutical industry.
The Notion of Genetic Cancer Proven Unequivocally False
As you
may have not heard, Dr. Weinberg reversed his original theory 12 years ago
after discovering that less than one DNA base in a million appeared to have
been miscopied, concluding that not enough defect existed to cause cell
mutation. His exact words: “Something was very wrong. The notion that a
cancer developed through the successive activation of a series of oncogenes
had lost its link to reality”. More recently, in 2005, the directors of the
world’s largest cancer research center in Houston, Texas, announced that
cancer’s prime cause is not genetic. Despite the magnitude of these
reports, they’ve been widely overlooked by the mainstream media, leaving
most in the dark as to the cause, cure and prevention of a disease that
killed 7.6 million people worldwide in 2007 (The American Cancer Society).
The Notoriously Illusive Cure
Reflect over your lifetime as to how many times you can recall hearing
reports of Millions of dollars in grant money being awarded for cancer
research. I’ve personally seen unfathomable amounts of money poured into
projects like these; yet, where’s the cure, where are the effective
prevention methods, where are the answers? Hundreds of people are receiving
new cancer diagnosis everyday. What other profession can you name that is
paid millions of dollars and consistently fails its mission over and over
again? I can’t name one.
Studies published leading people to believe “the genetic code of cancer has
been cracked” and that “scientists are on the brink of a cure” serve to give
hope (albeit false) for a “someday” cure. In actuality their design is to
drive large amounts of money in the form of donations, grants and
fundraisers to fund more research and develop new drugs to saturate people
with. Prescription drugs weren’t designed to cure illness or disease; at
best they provide temporary relief, but ultimately, history has shown them
to exacerbate existing conditions. And if history shows that drugs aren’t
the solution (which it does), then why continue spending millions of tax
payer dollars to fund “false hope” research in search of new drugs? I
suspect that “fear” drives most of this and the cancer industry is well
aware of the trump card called “fear.”
The Cause, Cure, and Prevention of Cancer – Yes There IS
Hope
Prevention is always better than cure and is in fact the key to conquering
cancer. Based on the 1966 discovery of one of the great Biochemists of the
20th century, Dr. Otto Warburg along with detailed experiments, verified
numerous times by scientists, the prime cause of cancer was shown to be the
inhibition of cellular respiration (hypoxia) to the degree of at least 35%.
Clinical researcher Dr. Amid Habib confirms that because no “cancer cell”
exists, the disease can be prevented if the full capacity
of cellular respiration is kept in tact. Researchers found that Essential
Fatty Acids (EFA’s), which are highly oxygen absorbing entities, actually
make it possible for enough oxygen to reach the cells via cell membranes.
Consumption of two primary EFA’s – Omega 6 and Omega 3 allow the body to
manufacturer any supplemental EFA derivatives it might need. Studies found
that exercise alone wasn’t enough to keep oxygen deprivation at the cellular
level below the 35% mark; due to the fact that the enriched supply of oxygen
to the blood doesn’t transfer oxygen into the cell membrane, showing why
some athletes still develop cancer.
Research then began looking into what environmental and/or dietary factors
would cause a cell to become oxygen deficient to the degree of 35%. It was
shown that consumption of genetically modified polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)
which incorporates into cell membranes, interfering with cellular oxygen
transmission is a fundamental cause
of cancer. If undamaged omega 6 isn’t fed to the brain, organs and muscles,
the body will have no other choice but to use damaged EFAs like
polyunsaturated fatty acids, causing cellular de-oxygenation. And when the
body’s omega-6 supply is less than what’s required, the body will prioritize
delivery, supplying the organs it considers most vital first: the brain,
heart, lungs, and kidneys.
The
work and research of
Johanna Budwig,
a German scientist and biochemist brought about a scientific revolution
connecting the relationship between cancer research and fat metabolism.
Yet, most of her work has gone unnoticed by conventional medicine as they
continue to propagate the gene theory of cancer. Could it be because
something as intricate as “gene therapy” let’s them off-the-hook and thus
enables them to continue to request millions of research dollars and give us
mile-markers such as “research will take 5-10 years”? How many times have
we heard this?
Marching to a Different Drummer
Regardless of the public’s dedication to what the conventional medical
community teaches in regards to preventing and treating cancer, the
continued rise over the last 40 years is a clear sign of the cancer
industry’s ineffectiveness and possible unwillingness to admit that past and
current research is not providing the answers that are needed to cure
cancer. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting different results. We have had at least 40 years of
“insanity”. Despite the magnitude of research such as that of Dr. Budwig, it
remains largely unknown to the public, irrespective of the fact that no
scientist or expert in the field has ever disproven the work. The good news
although is that a precancerous cell which has a lower degree of oxygen
inhibition can be prevented from permanently becoming cancerous if oxygen
deficiency is stopped early enough.
Quotes by Dr. Johanna Budwig from Cancer The Problem And The
Solution
“….everything is to no avail if a person’s normal respiration is cut off by
fats that have incorrectly been made to have a long shelf life, i.e. that
hinder oxygen absorption….Pseudo oils e.g. poly oils made to have a long
shelf life disturb the healing process…Cancer is a disease of the entire
body. In therapy the entire life process must be given the possibility to
heal and to overcome the cancer disease.”
One
scientist in the USA, a professor of natural science published: “Our society
is sacrificing itself on the altar of pseudo-science if it does not want to
ultimately acknowledge what is being offered to people as edible fat. We
cannot avoid this issue.”
“Fats
are the substances that govern all life phenomena, which responsibly
participate for orderly vital function, growth and absorption of the sun.
Vitamins, trace elements, etc. off no aid to a person IF he has been harmed
by consuming the wrong fats. We must recognize the reason for the damage if
we want to help this person.”
“The
dependence on the acid-base balance discussed so often today, this balance
will only be restored if highly unsaturated fats are restored as the natural
basis in the vital function in the blood and in the lymph of the person,
through a natural supply of natural seed oils with the highly unsaturated
fats. All other functions are important and remain important, but the base
disturbance must be resolved.”
Sources:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/551998
http://www.icgc.org/
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7239/full/nature07943.html
http://www.townsendletter.com/AugSept2007/efaoxy0807.htm
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/c/chronic/stats-country.htm
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_ACS_Report_Puts_Global_Cancer_Death_Rate_at_76_Million.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8414124.stm
Dr. Loretta Lanphier is a longtime
naturopathic doctor, the owner of
Oasis Advanced Wellness and a co-moderator of the Yahoo Health Group
focused on cancer, Oleandersoup.